Italy, 1610: young aspiring artist Artemisia (Valentina Cervi) has a professional curiosity about male anatomy that is forbidden to her eyes. Despite Artemisia’s prodigious talent, her gender prevents her being accepted as an art student. Her father, established artist Orazio Gentileschi (Michel Serrault) persuades dynamic Florentine painter Augustino Tassi (Predrag Manojlovic) to take Artemisia as his student. Tassi opens Artemisia’s eyes to new methods of composition, but his infatuation leads to her rape. Regretting his actions, Tassi professes love, but Orazio discovers their relationship and takes the matter to court. The result sees Artemisia interrogated and tortured, an event that has a lasting effect upon her life’s art.
Artemisia Gentileschi is considered the first, significant female painter in western art. An early baroque artist, influenced by Caravaggio, her startling depictions of violence won great acclaim and led to her becoming the first woman ever admitted into the Academy of Art and Design in Florence. Many scholars have interpreted her painting, Judith Beheading Holofernes as a revenge fantasy against the violence she suffered during her interrogation. Upon release, Agnès Merlet’s film faced criticism from the art world for portraying Artemisia’s involvement with Tassi as a tragic love affair. Meanwhile, film critics disliked the ambiguous depiction of their relationship as neither naïve, girlish fancy betrayed by rape, nor full blown love.
One could accuse Merlet of trying to have her cake and eat it, yet in truth such ambiguity staves off snap judgements and serves the story well. Predrag Manojlovic renders Tassi vacant and self-serving, his eleventh hour declaration of love doesn’t convince. However, this inconsistent characterization does not harm his climactic self-sacrifice, since Merlet appears to interpret it as the act of a wayward man trying to do the right thing. By contrast Valentina Cervi’s fiery, multilayered portrayal befits what more recent writers have striven for, which is a less reductive reading of Artemisia’s life and work. Presenting a dynamic young artist who used her past and personality as weapons to fight against prejudice in the art world.
It brings to mind Germaine Greer’s controversial declaration that rape isn’t the worse thing that could happen to a woman. Perhaps if ‘isn’t’ had been substituted with the words ‘shouldn’t be’, people would have a clearer idea of what Greer was suggesting. Though Tassi tries to convince her the rape was an act of love, Artemisia is able to reinterpret the trauma via her developing artistic awareness and see it for what it was. Cervi develops Artemisia from a wide-eyed ingénue into a passionate young heroine adept at sorting lies from the truth. Merlet’s roving camera explores undraped bodies with a painter’s eye while the beautiful cinematography Benoit Delhomme evokes the range of Artemisia’s palette with chiaroscuro interiors and idyllic landscapes saturated in gold. For all its faults the film remains an entrancing journey into the mind of a truly significant artist.
