HOME |  JOIN |  CULT MOVIES | COMPETITIONS | ADVERTISE |  CONTACT US |  ABOUT US
 
 
Newest Reviews
211
Top of the Bill
Set It Off
No Way Out
Traffik
Pitch Perfect 3
Insidious: The Last Key
Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick, The
Dirty Carnival, A
King of Hearts
Crowhurst
And the Same to You
Racer and the Jailbird
Superman and the Mole-Men
Phantom Thread
Sweet Country
Loophole
Irma La Douce
Brigsby Bear
Wish Upon
Gringo
Finding Vivian Maier
Shape of Water, The
Lady Bird
Endless, The
Universal Soldier: The Return
Lean on Pete
Carnival in Flanders
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
It Came from the Desert
   
 
Newest Articles
And It Was the Dirtiest Harry We Have Seen in a Very Long Time: The Dirty Harry Series
Manor On Movies: The Astounding She Monster
Manor On Movies: Don't be a dolt. That's not a cult (movie)
Wes Anderson's Big Daddies: Steve Zissou and Others
Bad Taste from Outer Space: Galaxy of Terror and Xtro
A Yen for the 1990s: Iron Monkey and Satan Returns
Hey, Punk: Jubilee and Rock 'n' Roll High School
Help! with The Knack: Richard Lester in 1965
Roll Up, Get Yer Free Cinema: The Shorts on the BFI Woodfall Blu-rays
Time for Heroes: The Dam Busters and How I Won the War
Hell is a City: Midnight Cowboy and Taxi Driver
Boris Goes Bonkers, Bela Goes Bats: The Old Dark House and Mark of the Vampire
Charles Bronson's Mid-70s: Breakheart Pass and Others
Kids in America: The Breakfast Club vs Metropolitan
80s Dance-Off: Staying Alive vs Murder-Rock vs Breakin'
   
 
  Subject Two It's like Christmas every day, but with more reanimation of the deadBuy this film here.
Year: 2006
Director: Philip Chidel
Stars: Christian Oliver, Dean Stapleton, Courtney Mace, Thomas Buesch, Jürgen Jones
Genre: Horror, Drama, Science Fiction
Rating:  7 (from 1 vote)
Review: This film is not a remake of Frankenstein. Make no mistake, it certainly owes it more than just a nod, and in fact it would even be a stretch to call it an homage. Subject Two is more like taking Frankenstein out for dinner, and getting into a really deep conversation with it about the nature of death, life and the states between the two that we don't yet understand. Where Frankenstein focused on the insanity and misunderstood ambition of the creator, and cast the monster as a destructive and ultimately tragic figure, Subject Two casts the 'monster' in a very different light and comes up with something equally chilling and intriguing - a lucid and fully participating subject, almost a pupil, and the relationship that develops between the doctor, the subject and the subject's condition is well handled.

It's rather a shame, then, that the makers felt the need to drop some contrastingly unsubtle 'hints' about the whole you-know-what connection. Frank Vick, for example, is the clanger of a name given to the eerie and seemingly heartless Doctor (Dean Stapleton). The subject, Adam (geddit?) Schmidt, a gifted but rebellious young medical student, is asked by e-mail to trek up to the Doctors secret shack high in the peaceful mountains of a winter Aspen. One happy deviation is the introduction of an Igor for the modern age; gone is the hump and Marty Feldman eyeballing, and in comes the delightful Courtney Mace. Her cameo is all too brief, since her performance is natural and engaging and one can only hope that more work is to follow this good start.

Adam, played by Christian Oliver, voluntarily hikes up the mountain to meet Dr. Vick. There is no corpse grabbing here, nor grave robbery, and no suspicious locals waving pitchforks and warnings. Adam is simply asked to come, and he does. The Doctor calmly garottes him to death before we're past the fifteen minute mark, and it's here that things get even more interesting. What follows is an often shocking and brutal series of deaths and rebirths, all at the hands of the oddly cast Dean Stapleton. At no point does one think "mad genius" when looking at Dean. Instead, the over-riding image is of Jack Nicholson circa Five Easy Pieces. Later elements of the film might assuage these concerns, but for the most part it's a strange and yet oddly compelling mixture as Frank n' Schmidt are left to their devices atop the peaks of Colorado.

Events prior to Adam's arrival are only hinted at in the violent opening scene and the partly buried corpse in the back yard with weird but scientific-looking tubes coming out of it...the Doctor, it seems, has been hard at work on a mysterious 'serum' (involving nanites, apparently) which can not only reanimate the dead, but actually return their cells to good-as-new working order. Wounds heal, blood flows, and most importantly Adam retains his rosy complexion throughout the hour and a half. Yet inexplicably his eyes lose all their colour, a nice cheap effect that adds just the right dose of unease to his appearance such that we never forget what he is.

And that's where the questions begin. Just what is he? Alive? Surely not. We saw him die at the hands of the Doctor. Injected with the serum post-death (surely that wouldn't work?) however, and thanks to the chilly air in Aspen (seriously) he is up and about and hiking through the mountains in no time. What follows is an exploration of the nature of life and death, a dead man's view of being alive, the value of a life and the ease with which a dead guy can take one.

The film neatly avoids any questions of relegion and spirituality, but it also avoids any of the pressing questions about the science behind these experiments. It doesn't really matter, though, since the original was able to fob off whole generations with just lightning. Then again, Frankenstein is a classic tale and highly original. This is a further exploration of an existing subject, and a few words about how they propose this all works wouldn't go amiss. Many of these questions are ones that the first time viewer will want answered. This is a film that starts better than it ends, and although it never mires itself in the predictable format of these types of things it does wrap things up neatly for itself whilst leaving many unanswerable questions for we in the land of the living.

The pacing is good, and despite the depth of topic the dialogue is both well written and performed, rather than overwrought and ham-handed. The makers have also done a very good job of disguising the low budget; shot in a matter of a few weeks, and with a crew of just eight, writer and director Philip Chidel has made an enjoyable if mildly flawed film, only his second. More independent horrors like this would certainly be welcome, since it's rare for as much humanity to feature in a film whose key subject is often treated cheaply.
Reviewer: Ted Forsyth

 

This review has been viewed 3057 time(s).

As a member you could Rate this film

 
Review Comments (0)


Untitled 1

Login
  Username:
 
  Password:
 
   
 
Forgotten your details? Enter email address in Username box and click Reminder. Your details will be emailed to you.
   

Latest Poll
Which film has the best theme song?
Spectre
The Ups and Downs of a Handyman
   
 
   

Recent Visitors
Graeme Clark
Enoch Sneed
Stately Wayne Manor
Darren Jones
Paul Smith
  Jamie Nichols
Andrew Pragasam
George White
   

 

Last Updated: