HOME |  JOIN |  CULT MOVIES | COMPETITIONS | ADVERTISE |  CONTACT US |  ABOUT US
 
 
Newest Reviews
Thelma
Stratton
February
Taking of Beverly Hills, The
Marjorie Prime
Hotel Salvation
Mangler, The
Shiraz
Mercy, The
Kickboxer: Retaliation
Molly Maguires, The
Party, The
Dante's Peak
Housemaid, The
Vendetta
Brimstone
Boys in the Trees
Once Were Warriors
Red Planet Mars
Blade Runner 2049
Devil's Express
Belko Experiment, The
Flashback
War of the Arrows
One-Trick Pony
Cloverfield Paradox, The
Beach Rats
In Between
Flesh Feast
Gerald's Game
   
 
Newest Articles
They're All Messed Up: Night of the Living Dead vs Land of the Dead
The House, Black Magic and an Oily Maniac: 3 from 70s Weird Asia
80s Meet Cute: Something Wild vs Into the Night
Interview with The Unseen Director Gary Sinyor
Wrong Forgotten: Is Troll 2 Still a Thing?
Apocalypse 80s UK: Threads and When the Wind Blows
Movie Flop to Triumphant TV Revival: Twin Peaks and The League of Gentlemen
Driving Force: The Golden Age of American Car Chases
Madness in his Method: Jim Carrey and Andy Kaufman
Music, Love and Flowers: Monterey Pop on Blu-ray
   
 
  Timeline Those crazy scientists and their time machines!Buy this film here.
Year: 2003
Director: Richard Donner
Stars: Paul Walker, Anna Friel, David Thewlis, Gerard Butler, Billy Connolly, Frances O'Connor, Ethan Embry, Neal McDonough
Genre: Science Fiction, Historical, Adventure
Rating:  3 (from 2 votes)
Review: This movie for me was a pre-Thanksgiving tradeoff – I got to watch a movie for free with my parents paying for it, but it wasn’t exactly the most thrilling movie I’ve seen, since Kill Bill: Volume 1 (highly recommended) came out a few months before this.

So then, If I had to use one word to describe Timeline, a movie debuting with much hype for its star, Paul Walker, and a heavy pedigree, with Richard Donner (of the Lethal Weapon movies) directing, and the script adapted from best-selling sci-fi author, Michael Crichton; what would that word be? The word that I would use would be “average”, and if pressed for a second word, I would say without hesitation “entertaining”. Yes, it was an average but entertaining film.

The plot is a fairly straightforward affair as megastar pretty-boy Paul Walker (star of the Fast and the Furious franchise) discovers to his badly acted chagrin, that his father, apparently the most brilliant scientist of all time, somehow discovered a “wormhole” leading to 1357 France which he promptly became trapped in. Shortly thereafter, Walker’s character, Chris, is sent by the government along with a rescue team, into the wormhole to find his father. The only catch is that they have to return in only a few hours otherwise they’ll be lost in time forever.

I don’t think I’m spoiling anything for the audience by saying that the plan doesn’t exactly go as planned. The excitement of the movie doesn’t go as well as planned either. Paul Walker bored me to tears in this movie. He displayed no range of character, did nearly nothing onscreen, and just seemed to be lurking about occasionally to get “face time”. And of course he gets the girl naturally. Sure, why wouldn’t he?

As for most of the other characters, they were awkward movie stereotypes: the military man with a hidden agenda, the gawky scientist that runs around googly-eyed and talking in high pitched tones the whole time, and the government employees who weren’t telling the whole truth of the operation to the rescue team.

So, despite the fact that most of the acting performances were poor, the other leading man in the picture (Gerard Butler) was surprisingly charismatic as he ran around 1357 France saving the damsel in distress, and sticking in swords in people at the appropriate times.

And I didn’t really touch on how slapdash the plot seems, as it features several leaps of reality. The first is how quick the scientific explanation is for the government being able to send people back in time through a wormhole. It’s almost like if you say it fast enough you might be able to slip it past the audience. At least it seemed to me like they were going for that. Additionally, the rescue team themselves escapes capture and death several times, and are able to find each other in a relatively large area easily when separated.

Getting back to the beginning of the review, the movie is at least relatively entertaining, since it maintains a fast pace (which helps cover up the flaws) and features lots of killing, explosions, and even a little time for romance.

Admittedly the less keen eyed viewer may actually wholeheartedly like this film, but for the rest of us, it earns a shrug and a one thumb up.
Reviewer: Joshua Dudley

 

This review has been viewed 4665 time(s).

As a member you could Rate this film

 
Review Comments (3)


Untitled 1

Login
  Username:
 
  Password:
 
   
 
Forgotten your details? Enter email address in Username box and click Reminder. Your details will be emailed to you.
   

Latest Poll
Which film has the best theme song?
Spectre
The Ups and Downs of a Handyman
   
 
   

Recent Visitors
Graeme Clark
Darren Jones
Enoch Sneed
Paul Smith
Jason Cook
  Andrew Irvine
Ian Phillips
Paul Shrimpton
   

 

Last Updated: