HOME |  JOIN |  CULT MOVIES | COMPETITIONS | ADVERTISE |  CONTACT US |  ABOUT US
 
 
Newest Reviews
Replacement Killers, The
On Any Sunday
Mourning Forest, The
Orloff Against the Invisible Man
Power Rangers
Loving
Squid and the Whale, The
Hangar 18
Flashback
Goose Steps Out, The
Ghost in the Shell
Anatahan
Elle
Cynic, the Rat and the Fist, The
No Holds Barred
Laughing Dead, The
Other Side of Hope, The
J'accuse!
Handmaiden, The
P'tit Quinquin
Sense of an Ending, The
Rift, The
Frantz
Nocturnal Animals
Get Out
My Life as a Dog
Mooch Goes to Hollywood
Free Fire
Moonlight
Kung Fu Yoga
   
 
Newest Articles
Computer Love: WarGames vs Electric Dreams
Dream Big: Elm Street vs Dreamscape
Whicker's Slicker: Whicker's World Vols 3&4 on DVD
Ladies First: Girls on Film 2 on DVD
Rock Back: 3 Cult Millennium Music Movies
Possession Obsession: Exorcist vs Amityville
The Italian Jobs: Eurocrime! on DVD
And Then? 6 Hollywood Films That Should Have Had Sequels But Didn't
Approaching Menace: The Frighteners on DVD
Oz Factor: Strange Australia on the Cusp of the 80s
   
 

Interview with filmmakers of Charlie Victor Romeo at 2013 Sundance Film Festival

  Part of the excitement of Sundance involves experimental films where the filmmakers create audacious and bold experiences. Such can be said for the documentary Charlie Victor Romeo in which the filmmakers create a series of six distressed airline scenes based on original black box recordings.

Co-editor Karlyn Berger and co-writer/producer Patrick Daniels took a few minutes out the cockpit to talk about the 2013 Sundance Film Festival entry Charlie Victor Romeo.

Q - What would you suggest to a frequent flyer who sees your film?

A - Karlyn – You are going to learn how incredible the people who are on the flight deck of your airplane, how professional, how hard they work, the level of training they have, how dedicated they would be should the possibility which is very, very low or that should ever a problem arise that they know what they are doing and they are going to do their darndest to get that plane safely on the ground.

Q - Why did you make this film? Is it to scare the bejesus out of us?

A – Patrick – That’s a part of it. It’s not like hey let's think of the craziest, scariest thing. What important to me personally is stuff that’s immediate, intense and communicative. The scaring part isn’t the operative part; it’s a function of these other things. And I think that people deal with their fear all of the time. When you can discuss fear and work with it and use it in yourself then everybody understands it automatically.

Q - If you had a bigger budget what would you have done differently?

A – Patrick – Regardless of the budget if we could do it over again we would make it differently. In my heart of hearts I would have liked to show the locations where the incidents happened.

Q - How does this film compare to airline crash movies such as “'Flight”, “Airport 75” and “Airplane”?

A – Patrick – One of the great things about “Airplane” is that the content is what it is. It is a wonderful film. They bring you into the cockpit in a way that you don’t expect and that’s cool. It’s a mechanism for the comedy but the view is an odd point of view. It’s really interesting where they place the camera. It’s not about the flying, it’s about the people who are in there. The difference isn’t anything but the fact that those various airline crash movies are fiction to whatever degree while ours is based on transcript. This is real human experience.
Author: Keith Rockmael

 

< Back to Article list

Untitled 1

Login
  Username:
 
  Password:
 
   
 
Forgotten your details? Enter email address in Username box and click Reminder. Your details will be emailed to you.
   

Latest Poll
Who's the best?
Bernard Cribbins
Tom Cruise
   
 
   

Recent Visitors
Graeme Clark
Enoch Sneed
  Vikki Sanderson
Darren Jones
Tom Le Surf-hall
Mark Le Surf-hall
  Michael Joy
Andrew Pragasam
   

 

Last Updated: 18 March, 2006